These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16271736)

  • 1. The ideal free distribution and bacterial growth on two substrates.
    Krivan V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Mar; 69(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 16271736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The steady states of microbial growth on mixtures of substitutable substrates in a chemostat.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Feb; 190(3):241-61. PubMed ID: 9514652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bacterial gene regulation in diauxic and non-diauxic growth.
    Narang A; Pilyugin SS
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):326-48. PubMed ID: 16989865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of some models of gene regulation in mixed-substrate microbial growth.
    Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(2):489-501. PubMed ID: 16650437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene regulation in continuous cultures: a unified theory for bacteria and yeasts.
    Noel JT; Narang A
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Feb; 71(2):453-514. PubMed ID: 19067083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mathematical model for microbial growth under limitation by conservative substrates.
    Nyholm N
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1976 Aug; 18(8):1043-56. PubMed ID: 953167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [On the theory of the growth of germs as function of time and concentration (author's transl)].
    Meyer R
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1975 Aug; 232(4):512-20. PubMed ID: 1199523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mathematical description of competition between two and three bacterial species under dual substrate limitation in the chemostat: a comparison with experimental data.
    Gottschal JC; Thingstad TF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1982 Jun; 24(6):1403-18. PubMed ID: 18546432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment.
    Ferenci T
    Adv Microb Physiol; 2008; 53():169-229. PubMed ID: 17707145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Utilization of the mix of growth and nongrowth substrates by microorganisms].
    Pirog TP; Kovalenko MO
    Mikrobiol Z; 2004; 66(6):80-100. PubMed ID: 15765875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamics of single-substrate continuous cultures: the role of ribosomes.
    Gupta S; Pilyugin SS; Narang A
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Feb; 232(4):467-90. PubMed ID: 15588630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic regulation in bacterial continuous cultures: II.
    Baloo S; Ramkrishna D
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1991 Dec; 38(11):1353-63. PubMed ID: 18600737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinetic studies on autohydrogenotrophic growth of Ralstonia eutropha with nitrate as terminal electron acceptor.
    Tiemeyer A; Link H; Weuster-Botz D
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 76(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17457540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial competition in serial transfer culture.
    Smith HL
    Math Biosci; 2011 Feb; 229(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 21163273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. INDISIM, an individual-based discrete simulation model to study bacterial cultures.
    Ginovart M; López D; Valls J
    J Theor Biol; 2002 Jan; 214(2):305-19. PubMed ID: 11812180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Batch growth kinetics of an indigenous mixed microbial culture utilizing m-cresol as the sole carbon source.
    Saravanan P; Pakshirajan K; Saha P
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Feb; 162(1):476-81. PubMed ID: 18573608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to determine control of growth rate in a chemostat. Using metabolic control analysis to resolve the paradox.
    Snoep JL; Jensen PR; Groeneveld P; Molenaar D; Kholodenko BN; Westerhoff HV
    Biochem Mol Biol Int; 1994 Aug; 33(5):1023-32. PubMed ID: 7987249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximization of steady-state bacterial production in a chemostat with pH and substrate control.
    Spitzer DW
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1976 Feb; 18(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 3237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competition for mixed substrates by microbial populations.
    Yoon H; Klinzing G; Blanch HW
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1977 Aug; 19(8):1193-210. PubMed ID: 884234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting stability of mixed microbial cultures from single species experiments: 1. Phenomenological model.
    Pilyugin SS; Reeves GT; Narang A
    Math Biosci; 2004 Dec; 192(2):85-109. PubMed ID: 15627488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.