These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16271818)

  • 1. Some decks are better than others: the effect of reinforcer type and task instructions on learning in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Fernie G; Tunney RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Feb; 60(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 16271818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Bowman CH; Turnbull OH
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 14607149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quick as a BLINK: an ultrarapid analogue of Iowa Gambling Task decision making.
    Peatfield NA; Turnbull OH; Parkinson J; Intriligator J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 22185565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-making skills in ASD: performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Mussey JL; Travers BG; Klinger LG; Klinger MR
    Autism Res; 2015 Feb; 8(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 25371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain regions involved in the learning and application of reward rules in a two-deck gambling task.
    Hartstra E; Oldenburg JF; Van Leijenhorst L; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Apr; 48(5):1438-46. PubMed ID: 20105435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post learning sleep improves cognitive-emotional decision-making: evidence for a 'deck B sleep effect' in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Seeley CJ; Beninger RJ; Smith CT
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112056. PubMed ID: 25409323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed-effects expectancy-valence model for the Iowa gambling task.
    Cheng CP; Sheu CF; Yen NS
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 19587175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision making in the reward and punishment variants of the iowa gambling task: evidence of "foresight" or "framing"?
    Singh V; Khan A
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():107. PubMed ID: 22833714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A potential role of reward and punishment in the facilitation of the emotion-cognition dichotomy in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Singh V
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():944. PubMed ID: 24381567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotion-based learning on a simplified card game: the Iowa and Bangor Gambling Tasks.
    Bowman CH; Turnbull OH
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 15177795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of reward magnitude differences on choosing disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    van den Bos R; Houx BB; Spruijt BM
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16095798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Steingroever H; Wetzels R; Horstmann A; Neumann J; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Mar; 25(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 22984804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotion-based learning and central executive resources: an investigation of intuition and the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Turnbull OH; Evans CE; Bunce A; Carzolio B; O'connor J
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 15780457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making in healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task: new insights from an operant approach.
    Bull PN; Tippett LJ; Addis DR
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():391. PubMed ID: 25904884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Iowa Gambling Task as a Direct Assessment of Impulsivity with Low-Income Children.
    Burdick JD; Roy AL; Raver CC
    Pers Individ Dif; 2013 Oct; 55(7):771-776. PubMed ID: 24072950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Cella M; Dymond S; Cooper A; Turnbull O
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Jul; 64(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 17368682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: the utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for predicting pathology.
    Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Campbell WK
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 17171543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alexithymia, cumulative feedback, and differential response patterns on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Ferguson E; Bibby PA; Rosamond S; O'Grady C; Parcell A; Amos C; McCutcheon C; O'Carroll R
    J Pers; 2009 Jun; 77(3):883-902. PubMed ID: 20078741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of deck- and trial-based approaches to advantageous decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Visagan R; Xiang A; Lamar M
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 22040516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instructional cues modify performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Balodis IM; MacDonald TK; Olmstead MC
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 16481083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.