These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16271824)

  • 1. A mathematical model to determine molecular kinetic rate constants under non-steady state conditions using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).
    Lele TP; Ingber DE
    Biophys Chem; 2006 Mar; 120(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 16271824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An improved mathematical approach for determination of molecular kinetics in living cells with FRAP.
    Lele T; Oh P; Nickerson JA; Ingber DE
    Mech Chem Biosyst; 2004 Sep; 1(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 16783931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for measuring rates of protein binding to insoluble scaffolds in living cells: histone H1-chromatin interactions.
    Lele T; Wagner SR; Nickerson JA; Ingber DE
    J Cell Biochem; 2006 Dec; 99(5):1334-42. PubMed ID: 16795044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells.
    Lele TP; Pendse J; Kumar S; Salanga M; Karavitis J; Ingber DE
    J Cell Physiol; 2006 Apr; 207(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 16288479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Force meets chemistry: analysis of mechanochemical conversion in focal adhesions using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Lele TP; Thodeti CK; Ingber DE
    J Cell Biochem; 2006 Apr; 97(6):1175-83. PubMed ID: 16408278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo.
    McNally JG
    Methods Cell Biol; 2008; 85():329-51. PubMed ID: 18155469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative interpretation of binding reactions of rapidly diffusing species using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Tsibidis GD
    J Microsc; 2009 Mar; 233(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19250459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FRAP and FRET methods to study nuclear receptors in living cells.
    van Royen ME; Dinant C; Farla P; Trapman J; Houtsmuller AB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 505():69-96. PubMed ID: 19117140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges and artifacts in quantitative photobleaching experiments.
    Weiss M
    Traffic; 2004 Sep; 5(9):662-71. PubMed ID: 15296491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of binding mechanisms of nuclear proteins using confocal scanning laser microscopy and FRAP.
    Tsibidis GD; Ripoll J
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):755-68. PubMed ID: 18538796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding the scope of quantitative FRAP analysis.
    Hallen MA; Layton AT
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Jan; 262(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 19836405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing fluorescence recovery curves for nuclear proteins undergoing binding events.
    Carrero G; Crawford E; Hendzel MJ; de Vries G
    Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1515-45. PubMed ID: 15522344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to study nuclear protein dynamics in living cells.
    van Royen ME; Farla P; Mattern KA; Geverts B; Trapman J; Houtsmuller AB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 464():363-85. PubMed ID: 18951195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FRAP analysis of binding: proper and fitting.
    Sprague BL; McNally JG
    Trends Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 15695095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reversibility and binding kinetics of Thermobifida fusca cellulases studied through fluorescence recovery after photobleaching microscopy.
    Moran-Mirabal JM; Bolewski JC; Walker LP
    Biophys Chem; 2011 Apr; 155(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21396764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling revealed by FRAP and FLIP technologies.
    Köster M; Frahm T; Hauser H
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 16(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 15722012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditions for using FRAP as a quantitative technique--influence of the bleaching protocol.
    Trembecka DO; Kuzak M; Dobrucki JW
    Cytometry A; 2010 Apr; 77(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 20131402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluorescence perturbation techniques to study mobility and molecular dynamics of proteins in live cells: FRAP, photoactivation, photoconversion, and FLIP.
    Bancaud A; Huet S; Rabut G; Ellenberg J
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2010 Dec; 2010(12):pdb.top90. PubMed ID: 21123431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRT letter: high speed scanning has the potential to increase fluorescence yield and to reduce photobleaching.
    Borlinghaus RT
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Sep; 69(9):689-92. PubMed ID: 16878313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A finite element model for protein transport in vivo.
    Sadegh Zadeh K; Elman HC; Montas HJ; Shirmohammadi A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2007 Jun; 6():24. PubMed ID: 17598901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.