These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16271951)

  • 1. Characterization of the TSU-PR1 cell line by chromosome painting and flow cytometry.
    Kim MS; Kim SH; Kim HJ; Hoang IN; Oh WM; Koh JT; Park HO; Jeong JY; Kim WJ; Lee EJ; Koh JY; Kim BY; Jensen RH
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Nov; 163(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16271951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TSU-Pr1 and JCA-1 cells are derivatives of T24 bladder carcinoma cells and are not of prostatic origin.
    van Bokhoven A; Varella-Garcia M; Korch C; Miller GJ
    Cancer Res; 2001 Sep; 61(17):6340-4. PubMed ID: 11522622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Array-CGH and multipoint FISH to decode complex chromosomal rearrangements.
    Darai-Ramqvist E; Diaz de Ståhl T; Sandlund A; Mantripragada K; Klein G; Dumanski J; Imreh S; Kost-Alimova M
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():330. PubMed ID: 17196103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of a novel human dedifferentiated liposarcoma cell line, FU-DDLS-1: conventional and molecular cytogenetic characterization.
    Nishio J; Iwasaki H; Ishiguro M; Ohjimi Y; Fujita C; Ikegami H; Ariyoshi A; Naito M; Kaneko Y; Kikuchi M
    Int J Oncol; 2003 Mar; 22(3):535-42. PubMed ID: 12579306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IPM-FISH, a new M-FISH approach using IRS-PCR painting probes: application to the analysis of seven human prostate cell lines.
    Aurich-Costa J; Vannier A; Grégoire E; Nowak F; Cherif D
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Feb; 30(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 11135431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proliferation of TSU-Pr1, a human prostatic carcinoma cell line is stimulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
    Enomoto M; Seong JY; Kawashima S; Park MK
    Life Sci; 2004 May; 74(25):3141-52. PubMed ID: 15081579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotypic characterization of prostatic carcinomas: a combined cytogenetic, flow cytometry, and in situ DNA hybridization study.
    Breitkreuz T; Romanakis K; Lutz S; Seitz G; Bonkhoff H; Unteregger G; Zwergel T; Zang KD; Wullich B
    Cancer Res; 1993 Sep; 53(17):4035-40. PubMed ID: 8358732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishment and molecular cytogenetic characterization of non-small cell lung cancer cell line KU-T1 by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and chromosome microdissection.
    Kume M; Taguchi T; Okada H; Anayama T; Tominaga A; Shuin T; Sasaguri S
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2007 Dec; 179(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 18036395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The complicated copy number alterations in chromosome 7 of a lung cancer cell line is explained by a model based on repeated breakage-fusion-bridge cycles.
    Kitada K; Yamasaki T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Aug; 185(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 18656688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Strategies to identify supernumerary chromosomal markers in constitutional cytogenetics].
    Douet-Guilbert N; Basinko A; Le Bris MJ; Herry A; Morel F; De Braekeleer M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2008 Sep; 56(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 18456432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of oral squamous cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Uchida K; Oga A; Okafuji M; Mihara M; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Chochi Y; Ueyama Y; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Jun; 167(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 16737909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular-cytogenetic analysis of fragmentation of chromosome 17 in the breast cancer cell line EFM-19.
    Rogalla P; Helbig R; Drieschner N; Flohr AM; Krohn M; Bullerdiek J
    Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):1987-92. PubMed ID: 12174875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
    Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
    Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of chromosome aberrations in esophageal cancer cell line KYSE180 by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Wu YP; Yang YL; Yang GZ; Wang XY; Luo ML; Zhang Y; Feng YB; Xu X; Han YL; Cai Y; Zhan QM; Wu M; Dong JT; Wang MR
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Oct; 170(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 17011979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma drug-resistant cell CNE2/DDP and its parent cell CNE2].
    Jiang RD; Hu L; Guan XY; Zhang LX; Yue W; Cen XT; Li CH
    Ai Zheng; 2004 Apr; 23(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 15087024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of pancreas cancer cell lines reveals high complexity chromosomal alterations.
    Griffin CA; Morsberger L; Hawkins AL; Haddadin M; Patel A; Ried T; Schrock E; Perlman EJ; Jaffee E
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2007; 118(2-4):148-56. PubMed ID: 18000365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenomas and follicular carcinomas of the thyroid display two major patterns of chromosomal changes.
    Castro P; Eknaes M; Teixeira MR; Danielsen HE; Soares P; Lothe RA; Sobrinho-Simões M
    J Pathol; 2005 Jul; 206(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 15852498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chromosome analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line KYSE 410-4 by repetitive multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Yang Y; Chu J; Wu Y; Luo M; Xu X; Han Y; Cai Y; Zhan Q; Wang M
    J Genet Genomics; 2008 Jan; 35(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18222404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.