156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16272088)
1. Scientific misconduct. MIT terminates researcher over data fabrication.
Couzin J
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5749):758. PubMed ID: 16272088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inquiry into misconduct excoriates Michigan State.
Maddox J
Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6410):287. PubMed ID: 8426641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Australia probes kidney researcher.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5567):449. PubMed ID: 11964450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer researcher found guilty of negligence.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):258. PubMed ID: 12447407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contact to the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty is the logical step].
Jensen IS
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Apr; 171(15):1308; author reply 1308. PubMed ID: 19422162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].
Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Sep; 138(36):1822-6. PubMed ID: 7935910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Catching the crooks.
Marris E
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):491. PubMed ID: 16675981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Doubts over biochemist's data expose holes in Japanese fraud laws.
Fuyuno I; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):514. PubMed ID: 16452938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Caveat lector.
Gershen BJ
Md Med; 2007; 8(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 17472148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
Normile D
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. Truth and consequences.
Couzin J
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5791):1222-6. PubMed ID: 16946046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
Bostanci A
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. Scandals shake Chinese science.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1464-6. PubMed ID: 16763127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Japan's research conduct.
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):634. PubMed ID: 16467795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific publishing. Hwang aftereffects reverberate at journals.
Couzin J; Holden C; Chong S
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5759):321. PubMed ID: 16424308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
