These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1627269)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Oldham RK
    Mol Biother; 1992 Mar; 4(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 1627269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators.
    Tipton CM
    Physiologist; 1991 Oct; 34(5):275, 278-9. PubMed ID: 1788353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):414. PubMed ID: 2725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review.
    Hershey DR
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):424. PubMed ID: 2755503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of peer-reviewed publication.
    Klein CN
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Jul; 48(7):1424, 1426. PubMed ID: 1882865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Aug; 141(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 2752346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Referees: their roles, rights, and responsibilities.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):464. PubMed ID: 8355955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.