These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16272826)

  • 1. Critical appraisal and review of the Rankin scale and its derivatives.
    New PW; Buchbinder R
    Neuroepidemiology; 2006; 26(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 16272826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale.
    Newcommon NJ; Green TL; Haley E; Cooke T; Hill MD
    Stroke; 2003 Feb; 34(2):377-8; author reply 377-8. PubMed ID: 12574545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis.
    Banks JL; Marotta CA
    Stroke; 2007 Mar; 38(3):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17272767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prestroke modified rankin stroke scale has moderate interobserver reliability and validity in an acute stroke setting.
    Fearon P; McArthur KS; Garrity K; Graham LJ; McGroarty G; Vincent S; Quinn TJ
    Stroke; 2012 Dec; 43(12):3184-8. PubMed ID: 23150650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of proxy-derived modified Rankin Scale assessment.
    McArthur K; Beagan ML; Degnan A; Howarth RC; Mitchell KA; McQuaige FB; Shannon MA; Stott DJ; Quinn TJ
    Int J Stroke; 2013 Aug; 8(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 22336127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Grant M; Baird T; Schulz UG; Muir KW; Bone I
    Stroke; 2002 Sep; 33(9):2243-6. PubMed ID: 12215594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a structured interview for telephone assessment of the modified Rankin Scale in Brazilian stroke patients.
    Baggio JA; Santos-Pontelli TE; Cougo-Pinto PT; Camilo M; Silva NF; Antunes P; Machado L; Leite JP; Pontes-Neto OM
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 38(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 25412853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review.
    Quinn TJ; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR
    Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3393-5. PubMed ID: 19679846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telephone assessment of stroke outcome is reliable.
    Merino JG; Lattimore SU; Warach S
    Stroke; 2005 Feb; 36(2):232-3. PubMed ID: 15637321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
    Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive assessment of disability post-stroke using the newly developed miFUNCTION scale.
    Zerna C; Burley T; Green TL; Dukelow SP; Demchuk AM; Hill MD
    Int J Stroke; 2020 Feb; 15(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 30917775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations.
    Harrison JK; McArthur KS; Quinn TJ
    Clin Interv Aging; 2013; 8():201-11. PubMed ID: 23440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical examination tools for lateropulsion or pusher syndrome following stroke: a systematic review of the literature.
    Babyar SR; Peterson MG; Bohannon R; Pérennou D; Reding M
    Clin Rehabil; 2009 Jul; 23(7):639-50. PubMed ID: 19403555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the reliability of the modified rankin scale.
    Quinn TJ; Dawson J; Walters MR; Lees KR
    Stroke; 2009 Mar; 40(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 19131664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales.
    Kasner SE
    Lancet Neurol; 2006 Jul; 5(7):603-12. PubMed ID: 16781990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composite Scores and Other Outcome Measures in Stroke Trials.
    Pistoia F; Sacco S; Ornello R; Degan D; Tiseo C; Carolei A
    Front Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 39():60-70. PubMed ID: 27463096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric properties of 2 simplified 3-level balance scales used for patients with stroke.
    Wang CH; Hsueh IP; Sheu CF; Yao G; Hsieh CL
    Phys Ther; 2004 May; 84(5):430-8. PubMed ID: 15113276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thinking About the Future: A Review of Prognostic Scales Used in Acute Stroke.
    Drozdowska BA; Singh S; Quinn TJ
    Front Neurol; 2019; 10():274. PubMed ID: 30949127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients.
    van der Lee JH; Beckerman H; Knol DL; de Vet HC; Bouter LM
    Stroke; 2004 Jun; 35(6):1410-4. PubMed ID: 15087552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.