323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16273690)
21. The interoperable electronic health record: preserving its promise by recognizing and limiting physician liability.
Jones SC; McMenamin J; Kibbe DC
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 18561455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Draft legislation would override states' privacy standards for EHRs.
Med Health; 2005 Nov; 59(40):3-4. PubMed ID: 16304900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Public health protection and the privacy of medical records.
Parmet W
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):265-304. PubMed ID: 11650561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974.
Kemp J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Healthcare information technology.
Lee A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-61. PubMed ID: 24482885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prescribing privacy: the uncertain role of the physician in the protection of patient privacy.
Gellman RM
North Carol Law Rev; 1984 Jan; 62(2):255-94. PubMed ID: 16100795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal and social responsibility in health service chains.
Dierks C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 134():107-11. PubMed ID: 18376038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When technology and health care collide: issues with electronic medical records and electronic mail.
Jurevic AM
UMKC Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):809-36. PubMed ID: 16273691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Meticulous handling of electronic patient records in general practice].
Lamberts H; van Boven C
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Oct; 144(43):2037-40. PubMed ID: 11072504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Health care information technology.
Paredes MJ
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2008 Jan; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 18345568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Bargaining with Hippocrates: managed care and the doctor-patient relationship.
Hall TS
S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(3):689-740. PubMed ID: 15214354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Legislation supports progress in health information technology.
Kertesz L
AHIP Cover; 2009; 50(2):10, 51, 53-4. PubMed ID: 19385312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Altered states: state health privacy laws and the impact of the Federal Health Privacy Rule.
Pritts JL
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 2(2):327-64. PubMed ID: 12669317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. HIPAA implementation.
Kans Nurse; 2002 Jan; 77(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 16381381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. E-mail in medical practice: legal and ethical concerns.
Bitter J
QRC Advis; 2000 Jan; 16(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 11184306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Healthcare Information Technology.
Lee A; Fleming JA;
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2016 Dec; 2016():1-77. PubMed ID: 28248467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health.
Anderson JG
Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(5-6):480-3. PubMed ID: 17064955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. EMR push will erode privacy, physician-patient relationship & increase risk.
Mena MC
Tenn Med; 2009 Aug; 102(8):9. PubMed ID: 19691194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Exemption of certain systems of records under the Privacy Act. Final rule.
Office of the Secretary, HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Sep; 73(188):55772-5. PubMed ID: 18985958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Who's peeking? As the federal government continues to wage the war on terror, electronic medical records could be fair game.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Oct; 38(41):26-8, 30. PubMed ID: 18972969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
