These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16273795)

  • 1. A 3-page standard protocol to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis (SPERA): efficient capture of essential data for clinical trials and observational studies.
    Pincus T
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S114-9. PubMed ID: 16273795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Standard Protocol to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPERA) for efficient capture of essential data from a patient and a health professional in a uniform "scientific" format.
    Pincus T; Callahan LF; Sokka T
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Nov; 35(4):843-50, xi. PubMed ID: 19962628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-page Standard Protocol to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPERA) for efficient capture of essential data from patients and health professionals in standard clinical care and clinical research.
    Pincus T; Sokka T
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):677-85. PubMed ID: 17678829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed 30-45 minute 4 page standard protocol to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis (SPERA) that includes measures of inflammatory activity, joint damage, and longterm outcomes.
    Pincus T; Brooks RH; Callahan LF
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 9972990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Landewé R; van der Heijde D
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S63-8. PubMed ID: 16273787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does a joint count calibration exercise make a difference? Implications for clinical trials and training.
    Stamp LK; Harrison A; Frampton C; Corkill MM
    J Rheumatol; 2012 Apr; 39(4):877-8. PubMed ID: 22467955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uniform databases in early arthritis: specific measures to complement classification criteria and indices of clinical change.
    Pincus T; Sokka T
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2003; 21(5 Suppl 31):S79-88. PubMed ID: 14969056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Evaluation Registry (ERATER) in the United States.
    Sokka T; Pincus T
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S178-81. PubMed ID: 16273804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Sokka T; Pincus T
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S58-62. PubMed ID: 16273786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scoring methods.
    Rau R; Wassenberg S
    J Rheumatol; 2002 Apr; 29(4):653-5. PubMed ID: 11950002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiencies of the 7 rheumatoid arthritis Core Data Set measures to distinguish active from control treatments in 9 comparisons from clinical trials of 5 agents.
    Pincus T; Richardson B; Strand V; Bergman MJ
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2014; 32(5 Suppl 85):S-47-54. PubMed ID: 25365089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Data Set and derivative "patient only" indices to assess rheumatoid arthritis.
    Pincus T
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S109-13. PubMed ID: 16273794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scores for all seasons: SDAI and CDAI.
    Smolen JS; Aletaha D
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2014; 32(5 Suppl 85):S-75-9. PubMed ID: 25365093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states.
    Aletaha D; Ward MM; Machold KP; Nell VP; Stamm T; Smolen JS
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Sep; 52(9):2625-36. PubMed ID: 16142705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985.
    Pincus T; Sokka T; Kautiainen H
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Apr; 52(4):1009-19. PubMed ID: 15818706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual issues in scoring radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Kirwan JR
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 10090190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of shoulder, elbow, and knee joint involvement on assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set.
    Tanaka E; Saito A; Kamitsuji S; Yamada T; Nakajima A; Taniguchi A; Hara M; Tomatsu T; Yamanaka H; Kamatani N
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Dec; 53(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 16342105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations of a quantitative swollen and tender joint count to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Pincus T
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 18937635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of the disease activity score (DAS) and the disease activity score using 28 joint counts (DAS28).
    van Riel PL
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2014; 32(5 Suppl 85):S-65-74. PubMed ID: 25365092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria.
    Fransen J; van Riel PL
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S93-9. PubMed ID: 16273792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.