540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16274299)
1. Acellular dermal matrix for mucogingival surgery: a meta-analysis.
Gapski R; Parks CA; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1814-22. PubMed ID: 16274299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 2: Ordinary and individual patient data meta-analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable.
Clauser C; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Pagliaro U; Pini-Prato G
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):741-56. PubMed ID: 12816306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 15212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Grisi MF; Souza SL; Taba MJ; Palioto DB
J Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 75(10):1350-6. PubMed ID: 15562912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.
Henderson RD; Greenwell H; Drisko C; Regennitter FJ; Lamb JW; Mehlbauer MJ; Goldsmith LJ; Rebitski G
J Periodontol; 2001 May; 72(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 11394391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and histological evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix allograft in combination with the coronally advanced flap in the treatment of Miller class I recession defects: an experimental study in the mini-pig.
Núñez J; Caffesse R; Vignoletti F; Guerra F; San Roman F; Sanz M
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 19508251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone.
Woodyard JG; Greenwell H; Hill M; Drisko C; Iasella JM; Scheetz J
J Periodontol; 2004 Jan; 75(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 15025216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of root coverage using two different acellular dermal matrix products.
Barker TS; Cueva MA; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Beach MM; Rossmann JA; Kerns DG; Crump TB; Shulman JD
J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1596-603. PubMed ID: 20629547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in humans.
Shepherd N; Greenwell H; Hill M; Vidal R; Scheetz JP
J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 19254123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study.
Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Esposito P; D'Archivio D; Lisanti L; Di Luccio A; Perinetti G
J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1299-307. PubMed ID: 12479634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
