These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1627522)

  • 1. Functional appliances and arch width.
    Gibbs SL; Hunt NP
    Br J Orthod; 1992 May; 19(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 1627522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional changes in dental arches after treatment with a prefabricated functional appliance.
    Ramirez-Yañez G; Sidlauskas A; Junior E; Fluter J
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 31(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 19161066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the dental arches and arch relationships: a biometric study.
    Hansen K; Iemamnueisuk P; Pancherz H
    Br J Orthod; 1995 May; 22(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 7640251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Elastic activator appliances: Bimler's elastic appliance and Klammt's elastic activator].
    Solano Reina E
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():373-80. PubMed ID: 1341726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.
    Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 8638579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel appliance.
    McDougall PD; McNamara JA; Dierkes JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 82(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6760718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
    Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency.
    da Silva Filho OG; Ferrari Júnior FM; Okada Ozawa T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 18416613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second molar extraction technique: overrated or underutilized?
    Rondeau BH
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(4):4-14. PubMed ID: 11314333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non extraction short-term arch changes.
    Ferro F; Perillo L; Ferro A
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5():18-43. PubMed ID: 15329745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Pavlin D; Illes D; Slaj M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 20578864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of Fränkel II treatment on arch width and arch perimeter.
    McWade RA; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 3477950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.