535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16275306)
1. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth.
Zeng J; Sato Y; Ohkubo C; Hosoi T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 16275306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro wear assessment of titanium alloy teeth.
Ohkubo C; Shimura I; Aoki T; Hanatani S; Hosoi T; Okabe T
J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 12501140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth.
Ghazal M; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 18546774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers.
Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
Ghazal M; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials.
Matsumura H; Leinfelder KF
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 7938432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth.
Kawano F; Ohguri T; Ichikawa T; Mizuno I; Hasegawa A
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12066486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists.
Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel.
Ghazal M; Yang B; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 17688934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials.
Kamonwanon P; Yodmongkol S; Chantarachindawong R; Thaweeboon S; Thaweeboon B; Srikhirin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
Tagtekin DA; Yanikoglu FC; Bozkurt FO; Kologlu B; Sur H
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compositional characteristics and hardness of acrylic and composite resin artificial teeth.
Loyaga-Rendon PG; Takahashi H; Hayakawa I; Iwasaki N
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 17692595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces.
Ghazal M; Kern M
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18976262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of microwave sterilization and water storage on the Vickers hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth.
Campanha NH; Pavarina AC; Vergani CE; Machado AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 15867760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth.
Suzuki S
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 15610545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear rates of artificial denture teeth opposed by natural dentition.
Douglas WH; Delong R; Pintado MR; Latta MA
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(2):43-7. PubMed ID: 8267870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
