BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16275793)

  • 1. Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.
    Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Dollberg S; Mandel D
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Nov; 159(11):1036-7. PubMed ID: 16275793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journals.
    Etter JF; Stapleton J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 19128941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Spanish pediatric publications in PubMed between 1996 and 2001].
    Bonillo Perales A
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Aug; 57(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 12139871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secular trends in impact factor of neonatology publications over a 10-year period.
    Marom R; Mimouni FB; Cohen S; Lubetzky R; Mandel D
    Acta Paediatr; 2012 Oct; 101(10):1095-7. PubMed ID: 22812652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature.
    Carter AO; Griffin GH; Carter TP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 16488354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
    Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: an observation on published controlled trials.
    Pitak-Arnnop P; Sader R; Rapidis AD; Dhanuthai K; Bauer U; Herve C; Hemprich A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 19896857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication bias in five dental implant journals: an observation from 2005 to 2009.
    Yuan JC; Shyamsunder N; Barao VA; Lee DJ; Sukotjo C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 22010086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size of randomized double-blind trials 1976-1991.
    Mulward S; Gotzsche PC
    Dan Med Bull; 1996 Feb; 43(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 8906985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of natural product clinical trials: a comparison of those published in alternative medicine versus conventional medicine journals.
    Cochrane ZR; Gregory P; Wilson A
    J Diet Suppl; 2011 Jun; 8(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 22432685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature.
    Bhandari M; Busse J; Devereaux PJ; Montori VM; Swiontkowski M; Tornetta Iii P; Einhorn TA; Khera V; Schemitsch EH
    Can J Surg; 2007 Apr; 50(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 17550715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
    Gravel J; Opatrny L; Shapiro S
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of lesser-impact-factor surgical journals as a source of negative and inconclusive outcomes reporting.
    Kanaan Z; Galandiuk S; Abby M; Shannon KV; Dajani D; Hicks N; Rai SN
    Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 21270633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology.
    Mimouni M; Krauthammer M; Gershoni A; Mimouni F; Nesher R
    Curr Eye Res; 2015; 40(8):858-61. PubMed ID: 25198281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials.
    Al-Hajeri AA; Fedorowicz Z; Amin FA; Eisinga A
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Apr; 27(4):526-30. PubMed ID: 16598332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the contents of complementary and alternative medicine journals.
    Coelho HF; Pittler MH; Ernst E
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2007; 13(4):40-4. PubMed ID: 17658121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.