These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16276320)

  • 1. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial.
    Lipson MJ; Sugar A; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 16276320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft daily wear: a visual quality of life study (interim results).
    Lipson MJ; Sugar A; Musch DC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Oct; 30(4):214-7; discussion 218. PubMed ID: 15499252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study.
    Walline JJ; Rah MJ; Jones LA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 15201713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of modifications in thickness, curvatures, and volume upon the cornea caused by disposable soft contact lens wear.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 25790813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malleability of the ocular surface in response to mechanical stress induced by orthokeratology contact lenses.
    Lu F; Simpson T; Sorbara L; Fonn D
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 18216565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of corneal morphological changes induced by the use of daily disposable contact lenses.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25246371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overnight orthokeratology: refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse-geometry lenses.
    Soni PS; Nguyen TT; Bonanno JA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Oct; 30(4):254-62; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 15499266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of myopia from corneal refractive therapy.
    Sorbara L; Fonn D; Simpson T; Lu F; Kort R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 15976589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparison of overnight lens modalities (COLM) study.
    Ritchey ER; Barr JT; Mitchell GL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2005 Mar; 31(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 15798477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term clinical outcomes for overnight corneal reshaping in children and adults.
    Lipson MJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 18327044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.
    Nason RJ; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Freeman MI; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 7822675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Daily disposable contact lenses versus spectacles in teenagers.
    Plowright AJ; Maldonado-Codina C; Howarth GF; Kern J; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 92(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25562479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 29221708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The current state of corneal reshaping.
    Walline JJ; Holden BA; Bullimore MA; Rah MJ; Asbell PA; Barr JT; Caroline PJ; Cavanagh HD; Despotidis N; Desmond F; Koffler BH; Reeder K; Swarbrick HA; Wohl LG
    Eye Contact Lens; 2005 Sep; 31(5):209-14. PubMed ID: 16163012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse-geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction.
    Wang J; Fonn D; Simpson TL; Sorbara L; Kort R; Jones L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4742-6. PubMed ID: 14578394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gas permeable (GP) versus non-GP lens wearers: accuracy of orthokeratology in myopia reduction.
    Subramaniam SV; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V; Morgan BW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 17502825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses.
    Aakre BM; Ystenaes AE; Doughty MJ; Austrheim Ø; Westerfjell B; Lie MT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Mar; 24(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 15005678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore.
    Li L; Moody K; Tan DT; Yew KC; Ming PY; Long QB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 19516144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.