These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16276687)

  • 1. [Evaluation of time-to-pregnancy as a measure in environmental epidemiology].
    Idrovo AJ; Sanín LH; Cole DC
    Biomedica; 2005 Sep; 25(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 16276687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Another comment on the role of statistical methods.
    Cox DR
    Phys Ther; 2001 Aug; 81(8):1469. PubMed ID: 11512546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry: outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation.
    Armenti VT; Daller JA; Constantinescu S; Silva P; Radomski JS; Moritz MJ; Gaughan WJ; McGrory CH; Coscia LA
    Clin Transpl; 2006; ():57-70. PubMed ID: 18368705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How many subjects are needed in a longitudinal birth cohort study?
    Golding J; Steer C
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 19490443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism.
    Holmes TH
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2004 Apr; 286(4):E495-501. PubMed ID: 15010353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic epidemiologic studies of preterm birth: guidelines for research.
    Pennell CE; Jacobsson B; Williams SM; Buus RM; Muglia LJ; Dolan SM; Morken NH; Ozcelik H; Lye SJ; ; Relton C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 17306646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental exposure and birth outcomes.
    Buczyńska A; Tarkowski S
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2005; 18(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 16411560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The healthy men study: design and recruitment considerations for environmental epidemiologic studies in male reproductive health.
    Olshan AF; Perreault SD; Bradley L; Buus RM; Strader LF; Jeffay SC; Lansdell L; Savitz DA; Herring A
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Mar; 87(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 17140573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental exposures and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review of the science.
    Stillerman KP; Mattison DR; Giudice LC; Woodruff TJ
    Reprod Sci; 2008 Sep; 15(7):631-50. PubMed ID: 18836129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
    Pickler RH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Always important--statistical justification for pooling heterogeneous studies?
    Goulis DG; Kantartzi PD; Papadimas I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):1031; author reply 1031-2. PubMed ID: 18325507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis of air pollution panel studies: an illustration.
    Janes H; Sheppard L; Shepherd K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 18(10):792-802. PubMed ID: 18922395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes.
    Windham G; Fenster L
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2 Suppl):e111-6; discussion e117. PubMed ID: 18308050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size: profound implications of mundane calculations.
    Lantos JD
    Pediatrics; 1993 Jan; 91(1):155-7. PubMed ID: 8416487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of time to pregnancy in environmental epidemiology and surveillance.
    Joffe M; Paranjothy S; Fielder H; Lyons R; Palmer S
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Jun; 30(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 18272548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.