These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1627715)

  • 1. Evaluating the impact of a promotional campaign for screening mammography: who attends?
    Adelson P; Irwig L; Turnbull D
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Mar; 16(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 1627715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the impact of a promotional campaign for screening mammography: women's knowledge and sources of awareness.
    Turnbull D; Adelson P; Irwig L
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Mar; 16(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 1627716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme.
    O'Byrne AM; Kavanagh AM; Ugoni A; Diver F
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 11202585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised trial of invitations to attend for screening mammography.
    Turnbull D; Irwig L; Adelson P
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 2025672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening participation: effects of a media campaign targeting Italian-speaking women.
    Page A; Morrell S; Tewson R; Taylor R; Brassil A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Aug; 29(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 16222935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychosocial impact of implementing a mammography screening campaign in an Australian community.
    Turnbull D; Irwig L; Simpson JM; Donnelly N
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Aug; 39(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 7973854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia.
    Cockburn J; Schofield P; White V; Hill D; Russell I
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Feb; 51(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 9135790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encouraging attendance at screening mammography: knowledge, attitudes and intentions of general practitioners.
    Cockburn J; Irwig L; Turnbull D; Simpson JM; Mock P; Tattersall M
    Med J Aust; 1989 Oct; 151(7):391-6. PubMed ID: 2796815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a strategy to encourage attendance for screening mammography.
    Cockburn J; Murphy B; Schofield P; Hill D; Borland R
    Health Educ Res; 1991 Sep; 6(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 10148693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of attendance at a relocatable mammography service for rural women.
    Cockburn J; Sutherland M; Cappiello M; Hevern M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 21(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 9489192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening--a population-based register study (Sweden).
    Lagerlund M; Maxwell AE; Bastani R; Thurfjell E; Ekbom A; Lambe M
    Cancer Causes Control; 2002 Feb; 13(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 11899121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
    Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
    Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammographic screening program to detect breast cancer.
    Hurley SF; Jolley DJ; Livingston PM; Reading D; Cockburn J; Flint-Richter D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Jun; 84(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 1593653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.
    Hurley SF; Huggins RM; Jolley DJ; Reading D
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Oct; 84(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 7943490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ineffective recruitment strategies for screening mammography: letterbox drops and invitations for friends.
    Turnbull D; Irwig L
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Mar; 16(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 1627717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.