245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16277721)
1. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Manns B; Laupland KB; Doig CJ
Crit Care; 2005 Oct; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder.
Hemels ME; Vicente C; Sadri H; Masson MJ; Einarson TR
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Apr; 20(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 15119985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement].
Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10918802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
Finckh A; Tramèr MR
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews.
van de Laar FA; Akkermans RP; van Binsbergen JJ
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 61(8):929-37. PubMed ID: 17251927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China].
Xiong J; Du YH; Li B; Shi L; Xu YY; Liu Q; Tian TT; Liu WH; Fu Y
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2009 Sep; 29(9):763-8. PubMed ID: 19803250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
