These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16277721)

  • 1. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Manns B; Laupland KB; Doig CJ
    Crit Care; 2005 Oct; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
    Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
    Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
    Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder.
    Hemels ME; Vicente C; Sadri H; Masson MJ; Einarson TR
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Apr; 20(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 15119985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement].
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10918802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews.
    van de Laar FA; Akkermans RP; van Binsbergen JJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 61(8):929-37. PubMed ID: 17251927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of methodology and report quality of systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of acupuncture-moxibustion in China].
    Xiong J; Du YH; Li B; Shi L; Xu YY; Liu Q; Tian TT; Liu WH; Fu Y
    Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2009 Sep; 29(9):763-8. PubMed ID: 19803250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.