136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16278132)
1. Aids to insertion: magnetic imaging, variable stiffness, and overtubes.
Shah SG; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 15(4):673-86. PubMed ID: 16278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.
Shah SG; Saunders BP; Brooker JC; Williams CB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jul; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10882954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").
Eickhoff A; van Dam J; Jakobs R; Kudis V; Hartmann D; Damian U; Weickert U; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 17156149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Williams CB; Thapar C; Suzuki N; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Aug; 56(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 12145596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insertability and safety of a shape-locking device for colonoscopy.
Rex DK; Khashab M; Raju GS; Pasricha J; Kozarek R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 100(4):817-20. PubMed ID: 15784024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.
Fritscher-Ravens A; Fox S; Swain CP; Milla P; Long G
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16528644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsive insertion technology.
Saito Y; Kimura H
Dig Endosc; 2011 May; 23 Suppl 1():164-7. PubMed ID: 21535226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of autonomous microrobotics in endoscopy.
Cheng WB; Moser M; Kanagaratnam S; Zhang WJ
J Med Eng Technol; 2011 Nov; 35(8):391-401. PubMed ID: 22074134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of the colonoscope: magnetic, fluoroscopic, or neither?
Waye JD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jul; 52(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 10882985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of forces exerted by a new computer-assisted colonoscope (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System).
Eickhoff A; Jakobs R; Kamal A; Mermash S; Riemann JF; van Dam J
Endoscopy; 2006 Dec; 38(12):1224-9. PubMed ID: 17163323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time.
Lee HL; Eun CS; Lee OY; Jeon YC; Han DS; Sohn JH; Yoon BC; Choi HS; Hahm JS; Lee MH; Lee DH; Moon W; Kim SY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):503-8. PubMed ID: 19152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Going for the loop: a unique overtube for the difficult colonoscopy.
Hawari R; Pasricha PJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 41(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 17245210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cath-Cam: a new concept in colonoscopy.
Long G; Fritscher-Ravens A; Mosse CA; Mills T; Swain P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6):997-1001. PubMed ID: 17140912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
