216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16278505)
1. Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations - aims and organization of the registry monitoring 300 000 births a year.
Latos-Bieleńska A; Materna-Kiryluk A;
J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 16278505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Determination of one national standard for children with congenital anomalies in the National Obstetrical Registry and in the National Neonatal Registry].
Dorrepaal CA; den Ouden AL; Cornel MC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Mar; 142(12):645-9. PubMed ID: 9623130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parental age as a risk factor for isolated congenital malformations in a Polish population.
Materna-Kiryluk A; Wiśniewska K; Badura-Stronka M; Mejnartowicz J; Wieckowska B; Balcar-Boroń A; Czerwionka-Szaflarska M; Gajewska E; Godula-Stuglik U; Krawczyński M; Limon J; Rusin J; Sawulicka-Oleszczuk H; Szwalkiewicz-Warowicka E; Walczak M; Latos-Bieleńska A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 23(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 19228312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system.
Ryan MA; Pershyn-Kisor MA; Honner WK; Smith TC; Reed RJ; Gray GC
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paper 1: The EUROCAT network--organization and processes.
Boyd PA; Haeusler M; Barisic I; Loane M; Garne E; Dolk H
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Mar; 91 Suppl 1():S2-15. PubMed ID: 21384531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Registration of congenital anomalies in Switzerland by EUROCAT.
Addor MC; Pescia G; Schorderet DF
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 130(38):1319-25. PubMed ID: 11064923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential of the European network of congenital anomaly registers (EUROCAT) for drug safety surveillance: a descriptive study.
Meijer WM; Cornel MC; Dolk H; de Walle HE; Armstrong NC; de Jong-van den Berg LT;
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2006 Sep; 15(9):675-82. PubMed ID: 16761260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paper 3: EUROCAT data quality indicators for population-based registries of congenital anomalies.
Loane M; Dolk H; Garne E; Greenlees R;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Mar; 91 Suppl 1():S23-30. PubMed ID: 21384530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Registries of malformations in the Rhône-Alps/Auvergne region. Value and limits of monitoring teratogenesis. 11 years' experience (1976-1986)].
Robert E; Francannet C; Robert JM
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 3230269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of clinical analysis in epidemiological research: the Spanish registry experience.
Martínez-Frías ML; Frías JL; Rodríguez-Pinilla E; Urioste M; Bermejo E; Cereijo A; Gaya F
Am J Med Genet; 1991 Nov; 41(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 1785633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new registry of congenital anomalies in Iran.
Dastgiri S; Kalankesh LR; Heidarzadehe M; Tajahmad A; Rezaian E
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 20795567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geospatial clustering of gastroschisis in Poland: Data from the Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations (PRCM).
Materna-Kiryluk A; Więckowska B; Wiśniewska K; Czyżewska M; Godula-Stuglik U; Baumert M; Margol R; Latos-Bieleńska A
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2016; 29(3):461-70. PubMed ID: 26988884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Congenital anomalies in Iran: a cross-sectional study on 1574 cases in the North-West of country.
Dastgiri S; Imani S; Kalankesh L; Barzegar M; Heidarzadeh M
Child Care Health Dev; 2007 May; 33(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 17439438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of record linkage between a statewide genetics service and a Birth Defects/Congenital Malformations Register to determine use of genetic counselling services.
Halliday J; Griffin O; Bankier A; Rose C; Riley M
Am J Med Genet; 1997 Oct; 72(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 9295066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting of malformations in routine health registers.
Hemminki E; Meriläinen J; Teperi J
Teratology; 1993 Sep; 48(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 8248860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias in congenital malformations information from the birth certificate.
Hexter AC; Harris JA
Teratology; 1991 Aug; 44(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 1925976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Working mothers and the risk of congenital defects: the results of the EUROCAT registry in the province of Florence. European Registry of Congenital Anomalies and Twins].
Bianchi F; Pierini A; Romanelli AM; Protti AM; Signorini S; Seniori Costantini A
Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):197-9. PubMed ID: 8766322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Birth defects ascertainment in the Philippines.
Padilla- CD; Cutiongco EM; Sia JM
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():239-43. PubMed ID: 15906745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
