BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16278953)

  • 1. Rank-based methods as a non-parametric alternative of the T-statistic for the analysis of biological microarray data.
    Breitling R; Herzyk P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 3(5):1171-89. PubMed ID: 16278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Baumgartner-Weiss-Schindler test for the detection of differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.
    Neuhäuser M; Senske R
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3553-64. PubMed ID: 15284098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments via statistic synthesis.
    Yang YH; Xiao Y; Segal MR
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1084-93. PubMed ID: 15513985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spot intensity ratio statistics in two-channel microarray experiments.
    Park T; Kim K; Yi SG; Kim JH; Lee YS; Lee S
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 5(4):865-73. PubMed ID: 17787060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using weighted permutation scores to detect differential gene expression with microarray data.
    Guo X; Pan W
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Aug; 3(4):989-1006. PubMed ID: 16078371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and evaluation of methods for generating differentially expressed gene lists from microarray data.
    Jeffery IB; Higgins DG; Culhane AC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():359. PubMed ID: 16872483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New criteria for selecting differentially expressed genes.
    Loo LH; Roberts S; Hrebien L; Kam M
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2007; 26(2):17-26. PubMed ID: 17441605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of two sample t-test statistics from redundant probe sets to evaluate different probe set algorithms in GeneChip studies.
    Hu Z; Willsky GR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():12. PubMed ID: 16403228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification of microarray data with factor mixture models.
    Martella F
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 16287938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified nonparametric approaches to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.
    Zhao Y; Pan W
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jun; 19(9):1046-54. PubMed ID: 12801864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
    Troyanskaya OG; Garber ME; Brown PO; Botstein D; Altman RB
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1454-61. PubMed ID: 12424116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.
    Sha N; Tadesse MG; Vannucci M
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A statistical framework for the design of microarray experiments and effective detection of differential gene expression.
    Zhang SD; Gant TW
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2821-8. PubMed ID: 15180939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A variational Bayesian mixture modelling framework for cluster analysis of gene-expression data.
    Teschendorff AE; Wang Y; Barbosa-Morais NL; Brenton JD; Caldas C
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3025-33. PubMed ID: 15860564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rank-based clustering analysis for the time-course microarray data.
    Yi SG; Joo YJ; Park T
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Feb; 7(1):75-91. PubMed ID: 19226661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.