These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16279135)

  • 1. Randomization inference for balanced cluster-randomized trials.
    Raab GM; Butcher I
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 16279135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Balance in cluster randomized trials.
    Raab GM; Butcher I
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 11180306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).
    Dickinson LM; Beaty B; Fox C; Pace W; Dickinson WP; Emsermann C; Kempe A
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(5):663-72. PubMed ID: 26355139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.
    Laopaiboon M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Dec; 12(6):515-30. PubMed ID: 14653354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges of cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MJ
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 24969154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constrained randomization and statistical inference for multi-arm parallel cluster randomized controlled trials.
    Zhou Y; Turner EL; Simmons RA; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(10):1862-1883. PubMed ID: 35146788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An application of a modified constrained randomization process to a practice-based cluster randomized trial to improve colorectal cancer screening.
    Nietert PJ; Jenkins RG; Nemeth LS; Ornstein SM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Mar; 30(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 18977314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of heterogeneous variance on efficiency and power of cluster randomized trials with a balanced 2 × 2 factorial design.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):574-93. PubMed ID: 25911332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
    Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a covariate-constrained randomization procedure in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chaussee EL; Dickinson LM; Fairclough DL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106409. PubMed ID: 33894362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review.
    Ivers NM; Halperin IJ; Barnsley J; Grimshaw JM; Shah BR; Tu K; Upshur R; Zwarenstein M
    Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():120. PubMed ID: 22853820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mind the gap: covariate constrained randomisation can protect against substantial power loss in parallel cluster randomised trials.
    Kristunas C; Grayling M; Gray LJ; Hemming K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):111. PubMed ID: 35413793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study.
    Xiao L; Lavori PW; Wilson SR; Ma J
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21335590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restricted randomization of ZAMSTAR: a 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized trial.
    Sismanidis C; Moulton LH; Ayles H; Fielding K; Schaap A; Beyers N; Bond G; Godfrey-Faussett P; Hayes R
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):316-27. PubMed ID: 18697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.