BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16279136)

  • 1. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.
    Laopaiboon M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Dec; 12(6):515-30. PubMed ID: 14653354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster randomized trials produced similar results to individually randomized trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression.
    Gilbody S; Bower P; Torgerson D; Richards D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 18177789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
    Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to analyse continuous data from pseudo cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; Melis RJ; Borm GF
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4100-15. PubMed ID: 17328006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges of cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MJ
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 24969154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.
    Fisher DJ; Copas AJ; Tierney JF; Parmar MK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):949-67. PubMed ID: 21411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research.
    Campbell MK; Fayers PM; Grimshaw JM
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16279131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials.
    Lee KJ; Thompson SG
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16279138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs.
    Konnyu KJ; Taljaard M; Ivers NM; Moher D; Grimshaw JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():307-318. PubMed ID: 34171503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of standardised mean differences from randomised trials with treatment-related clustering associated with care providers.
    Walwyn R; Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1043-1067. PubMed ID: 27910117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power in three-arm cluster randomized trials.
    Liu XS
    Eval Health Prof; 2014 Dec; 37(4):470-87. PubMed ID: 23908381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intent-to-treat analysis of cluster randomized trials when clusters report unidentifiable outcome proportions.
    DeSantis SM; Li R; Zhang Y; Wang X; Vernon SW; Tilley BC; Koch G
    Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):627-636. PubMed ID: 32838555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.