These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16279136)

  • 21. Model mis-specification and overestimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 15977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sample size calculation for treatment effects in randomized trials with fixed cluster sizes and heterogeneous intraclass correlations and variances.
    Candel MJ; van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):557-73. PubMed ID: 25519890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cluster-randomized trials.
    Fayers PM; Jordhøy MS; Kaasa S
    Palliat Med; 2002 Jan; 16(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 11963457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ancient black art and transdisciplinary extent of pseudoreplication.
    Hurlbert SH
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):434-43. PubMed ID: 19929111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials.
    Preisser JS; Young ML; Zaccaro DJ; Wolfson M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1235-54. PubMed ID: 12687653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized trials or population-based registries.
    Bergqvist D; Björck M; Säwe J; Troëng T
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 17689818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):279-89; discussion 300-1. PubMed ID: 8030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of clinical data with breached blindness.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 15083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian network meta-analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):236-250. PubMed ID: 27390267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Timeline cluster: a graphical tool to identify risk of bias in cluster randomised trials.
    Caille A; Kerry S; Tavernier E; Leyrat C; Eldridge S; Giraudeau B
    BMJ; 2016 Aug; 354():i4291. PubMed ID: 27530617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When is a further clinical trial justified?
    Ferreira ML; Herbert RD; Crowther MJ; Verhagen A; Sutton AJ
    BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e5913. PubMed ID: 22977141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MK; Thomson S; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS; Grimshaw JM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Mar; 34(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 14972631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ratio of geometric means to analyze continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: comparison to mean differences and ratio of arithmetic means using empiric data and simulation.
    Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1857-86. PubMed ID: 22438170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
    Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.