These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16279807)

  • 1. Statistical tools for virtual screening.
    Krumrine JR; Maynard AT; Lerman CL
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7477-81. PubMed ID: 16279807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual high-throughput screening of molecular databases.
    Seifert MH; Kraus J; Kramer B
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 17554856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deriving knowledge through data mining high-throughput screening data.
    Diller DJ; Hobbs DW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(25):6373-83. PubMed ID: 15566306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMR-based screening data.
    Hajduk PJ; Huth JR; Fesik SW
    J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2518-25. PubMed ID: 15801841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A web-based platform for virtual screening.
    Watson P; Verdonk M; Hartshorn MJ
    J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 12798392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
    Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites.
    Schmidtke P; Barril X
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5858-67. PubMed ID: 20684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications.
    Ripphausen P; Nisius B; Peltason L; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2010 Dec; 53(24):8461-7. PubMed ID: 20929257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
    Perola E
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unified, probabilistic framework for structure- and ligand-based virtual screening.
    Swann SL; Brown SP; Muchmore SW; Patel H; Merta P; Locklear J; Hajduk PJ
    J Med Chem; 2011 Mar; 54(5):1223-32. PubMed ID: 21309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large-scale similarity search profiling of ChEMBL compound data sets.
    Heikamp K; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1831-9. PubMed ID: 21728295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening.
    Vogt M; Stumpfe D; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5707-15. PubMed ID: 20684607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high-throughput screening: a case study on small-molecule inhibitors of angiogenin.
    Jenkins JL; Kao RY; Shapiro R
    Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 12471601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
    Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors.
    Nettles JH; Jenkins JL; Bender A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Glick M
    J Med Chem; 2006 Nov; 49(23):6802-10. PubMed ID: 17154510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.
    Seifert MH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):602-12. PubMed ID: 18293951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability.
    Sirois S; Hatzakis G; Wei D; Du Q; Chou KC
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Feb; 29(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15680586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In silico identification of bioisosteric functional groups.
    Ertl P
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 17554854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.