BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16279896)

  • 1. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Funding, disease area, and internal validity of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Kjaergard LL; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2708-13. PubMed ID: 12425537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The journal impact factor: judging a book by its cover.
    Vakil N
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2436-7. PubMed ID: 16279897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trials in HEPATOLOGY: predictors of quality.
    Kjaergard LL; Nikolova D; Gluud C
    Hepatology; 1999 Nov; 30(5):1134-8. PubMed ID: 10534332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
    Hill CL; LaValley MP; Felson DT
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Mar; 46(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 11920415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence of underpowered randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
    Keen HI; Pile K; Hill CL
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):2083-8. PubMed ID: 16265683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Altman DG; Grimes DA; Doré CJ
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1995 Aug; Doc No 197():[81 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8542098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.
    Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Dollberg S; Mandel D
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Nov; 159(11):1036-7. PubMed ID: 16275793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in respiratory research in 2010.
    Lu Y; Yao Q; Gu J; Shen C
    Respir Care; 2013 Sep; 58(9):1546-51. PubMed ID: 23307824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders.
    Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):727-34; discussion 735-7. PubMed ID: 15249101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
    Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
    Pildal J; Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1049. PubMed ID: 15817527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fecal incontinence: the quality of reported randomized, controlled trials in the last ten years.
    Parés D; Norton C; Chelvanayagam S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jan; 51(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18085335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design, quality, and bias in randomized controlled trials of systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Karassa FB; Tatsioni A; Ioannidis JP
    J Rheumatol; 2003 May; 30(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 12734892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
    Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.