These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during laparoscopic varicocelectomy: early results. Rabah DM; Adwan AA; Seida MA Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4826-30. PubMed ID: 19796458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for recurrent or persistent varicoceles associated with orchalgia. Chawla A; Kulkarni G; Kamal K; Zini A Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1072-4. PubMed ID: 16286126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adolescent varicocelectomy: postoperative catch-up growth is not secondary to lymphatic ligation. Poon SA; Kozakowski KA; Decastro GJ; Gjertson CK; Glassberg KI J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Feb; 5(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18805058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Varicocele in male factor infertility: role of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Chen C Int Surg; 2006; 91(5 Suppl):S90-4. PubMed ID: 17436610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Al-Kandari AM; Shabaan H; Ibrahim HM; Elshebiny YH; Shokeir AA Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical standardization of laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in children using isosulfan blue. Esposito C; Iaquinto M; Escolino M; Cortese G; De Pascale T; Chiarenza F; Cerulo M; Settimi A J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Apr; 49(4):660-3. PubMed ID: 24726132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative analysis of three different surgical approaches to varicocelectomy]. Chen XF; Zhou LX; Liu YD; Ping P; Chen YH; Cao M; Sun J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 May; 15(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 19514552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical modification of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time. Zini A; Fischer A; Bellack D; Noss M; Kamal K; Chow V; Mak V Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):803-6. PubMed ID: 16566968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A decade of laparoscopic varicocelectomy: costs and learning stages]. Jiménez Garrido A; García de la Torre MV; Sánchez de Badajoz E Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Apr; 52(3):245-8; discussion 248-9. PubMed ID: 10371740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial. Schwentner C; Oswald J; Lunacek A; Deibl M; Bartsch G; Radmayr C J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1049-52. PubMed ID: 16469616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial comment to Umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus inguinal varicocelectomy for bilateral varicocele: a comparative study. Gat Y; Gornish M Int J Urol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 21332820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference? Liu X; Zhang H; Ruan X; Xiao H; Huang W; Li L; Gao X; Zhang Y World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 23001636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beneficial effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters in patients who underwent surgery for causes other than infertility. Cho SY; Kim TB; Ku JH; Paick JS; Kim SW Urology; 2011 May; 77(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 21208647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility]. Pan LJ; Xia XY; Huang YF; Gao JP Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Jul; 14(7):640-4. PubMed ID: 18686388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]