275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281292)
1. Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets.
Thirion B; Flandin G; Pinel P; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Poline JB
Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Aug; 27(8):678-93. PubMed ID: 16281292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Groupwise spatial normalization of fMRI data based on multi-range functional connectivity patterns.
Jiang D; Du Y; Cheng H; Jiang T; Fan Y
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():355-72. PubMed ID: 23727315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI.
Makni S; Idier J; Vincent T; Thirion B; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Ciuciu P
Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):941-69. PubMed ID: 18439839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving reliability of subject-level resting-state fMRI parcellation with shrinkage estimators.
Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Shou H; Crainiceanu CM; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky S; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():14-29. PubMed ID: 25731998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI.
Blumensath T; Jbabdi S; Glasser MF; Van Essen DC; Ugurbil K; Behrens TE; Smith SM
Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():313-24. PubMed ID: 23523803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-level parcellation approach for brain functional connectivity analysis.
Karkar S; Faisan S; Thoraval L; Foucher JR
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3497-500. PubMed ID: 19964995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional parcellation of the hippocampus by semi-supervised clustering of resting state fMRI data.
Cheng H; Zhu H; Zheng Q; Liu J; He G
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16402. PubMed ID: 33009447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural analysis of fMRI data revisited: improving the sensitivity and reliability of fMRI group studies.
Thirion B; Pinel P; Tucholka A; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Mangin JF; Poline JB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1256-69. PubMed ID: 17896597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parcellation of fMRI datasets with ICA and PLS--a data driven approach.
Ji Y; Hervé PY; Aickelin U; Pitiot A
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):984-91. PubMed ID: 20426084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finding landmarks in the functional brain: detection and use for group characterization.
Thirion B; Pinel P; Poline JB
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):476-83. PubMed ID: 16685994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cluster overlap measure for comparison of activations in fMRI studies.
Cecchi GA; Garg R; Rao AR
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):1018-25. PubMed ID: 20426088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing inter-subject anatomical variation: effect of normalization method on sensitivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis in auditory cortex and the superior temporal region.
Tahmasebi AM; Abolmaesumi P; Zheng ZZ; Munhall KG; Johnsrude IS
Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1522-31. PubMed ID: 19481162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable precision registration via wavelets: optimal spatial scales for inter-subject registration of functional MRI.
Suckling J; Long C; Triantafyllou C; Brammer M; Bullmore E
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 16431137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust brain parcellation using sparse representation on resting-state fMRI.
Zhang Y; Caspers S; Fan L; Fan Y; Song M; Liu C; Mo Y; Roski C; Eickhoff S; Amunts K; Jiang T
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3565-79. PubMed ID: 25156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of consensus clustering-based framework for brain segmentation using resting fMRI.
Ryali S; Chen T; Padmanabhan A; Cai W; Menon V
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():128-40. PubMed ID: 25450335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI.
Pajula J; Tohka J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 32(9):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24970023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atlas-based head modeling and spatial normalization for high-density diffuse optical tomography: in vivo validation against fMRI.
Ferradal SL; Eggebrecht AT; Hassanpour M; Snyder AZ; Culver JP
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 1(0 1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23578579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human brain mapping: A systematic comparison of parcellation methods for the human cerebral cortex.
Arslan S; Ktena SI; Makropoulos A; Robinson EC; Rueckert D; Parisot S
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():5-30. PubMed ID: 28412442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fMRI.
Li H; Satterthwaite TD; Fan Y
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():1-13. PubMed ID: 28483721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
