These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281292)
1. Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets. Thirion B; Flandin G; Pinel P; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Poline JB Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Aug; 27(8):678-93. PubMed ID: 16281292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Groupwise spatial normalization of fMRI data based on multi-range functional connectivity patterns. Jiang D; Du Y; Cheng H; Jiang T; Fan Y Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():355-72. PubMed ID: 23727315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI. Makni S; Idier J; Vincent T; Thirion B; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Ciuciu P Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):941-69. PubMed ID: 18439839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI. Blumensath T; Jbabdi S; Glasser MF; Van Essen DC; Ugurbil K; Behrens TE; Smith SM Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():313-24. PubMed ID: 23523803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-level parcellation approach for brain functional connectivity analysis. Karkar S; Faisan S; Thoraval L; Foucher JR Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3497-500. PubMed ID: 19964995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional parcellation of the hippocampus by semi-supervised clustering of resting state fMRI data. Cheng H; Zhu H; Zheng Q; Liu J; He G Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16402. PubMed ID: 33009447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural analysis of fMRI data revisited: improving the sensitivity and reliability of fMRI group studies. Thirion B; Pinel P; Tucholka A; Roche A; Ciuciu P; Mangin JF; Poline JB IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1256-69. PubMed ID: 17896597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finding landmarks in the functional brain: detection and use for group characterization. Thirion B; Pinel P; Poline JB Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):476-83. PubMed ID: 16685994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cluster overlap measure for comparison of activations in fMRI studies. Cecchi GA; Garg R; Rao AR Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):1018-25. PubMed ID: 20426088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing inter-subject anatomical variation: effect of normalization method on sensitivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis in auditory cortex and the superior temporal region. Tahmasebi AM; Abolmaesumi P; Zheng ZZ; Munhall KG; Johnsrude IS Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1522-31. PubMed ID: 19481162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable precision registration via wavelets: optimal spatial scales for inter-subject registration of functional MRI. Suckling J; Long C; Triantafyllou C; Brammer M; Bullmore E Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 16431137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust brain parcellation using sparse representation on resting-state fMRI. Zhang Y; Caspers S; Fan L; Fan Y; Song M; Liu C; Mo Y; Roski C; Eickhoff S; Amunts K; Jiang T Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3565-79. PubMed ID: 25156576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of consensus clustering-based framework for brain segmentation using resting fMRI. Ryali S; Chen T; Padmanabhan A; Cai W; Menon V J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():128-40. PubMed ID: 25450335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI. Pajula J; Tohka J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 32(9):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24970023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis. Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atlas-based head modeling and spatial normalization for high-density diffuse optical tomography: in vivo validation against fMRI. Ferradal SL; Eggebrecht AT; Hassanpour M; Snyder AZ; Culver JP Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 1(0 1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23578579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human brain mapping: A systematic comparison of parcellation methods for the human cerebral cortex. Arslan S; Ktena SI; Makropoulos A; Robinson EC; Rueckert D; Parisot S Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():5-30. PubMed ID: 28412442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fMRI. Li H; Satterthwaite TD; Fan Y Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():1-13. PubMed ID: 28483721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]