330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281330)
1. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
Pachman TS
Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
Sieck WA
Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents.
Dillon LM
Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
King M
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Trespalacios MJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
Muller RJ
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
Rosado M
New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technologies and the pregnancy process: developing an equality model to protect reproductive liberties.
Daar JF
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(4):455-77. PubMed ID: 10629732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
Panitch AR
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
Malo PE
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes.
Waldman E
Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
Kaplan S
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
Fleming NA
Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Disputes over frozen embryos: who wins, who loses, and how do we decide?--An analysis of Davis v. Davis, York v. Jones, and state statutes affecting reproductive choices.
Ahnen CD
Creighton Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(4):1299-357. PubMed ID: 16130262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
Katz DA
Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes.
Coleman CH
Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives.
Cahn NR
Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
