546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281338)
1. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
Cherry AL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Degendering reproduction?
Jackson E
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
Tweedt DE
Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
Arellano Mde J
Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [5/6. Obstetric delivery and confidentiality].
Ponte C
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2010; (256):45-6. PubMed ID: 20925310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
Peto A; Kossuth E
Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reframing social justice, feminism and abortion.
Farrell SA
Conscience; 2005; 26(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 16639812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
Callahan J
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
Merchant J
Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mónica Roa: legal champion of abortion rights.
Mohammadi D
Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9964):221. PubMed ID: 25706699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and human rights.
Shaw D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
Parks J
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When pregnancy is an injury: rape, law, and culture.
Bridges KM
Stanford Law Rev; 2013 Mar; 65(3):457-516. PubMed ID: 23607144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
