413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281341)
21. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Poppema ST
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Gartner EC
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Recent developments in the abortion area.
Scanlan AL
Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 11661372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
Wyser-Pratte RC
Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
Kissling F
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
Davis PC; Gilligan C
McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
Walsh KP
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
Bradford CS
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
Roden GJ
St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Nordholm S
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
Morgan RG
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
