These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16281341)
41. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The exception that swallowed the rule? Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich and the mental health exception to post-viability abortion bans. Wassom BD Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1999; 49(4):799-867. PubMed ID: 12173630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions. Orentlicher D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Harm to fetuses becomes issue in Utah and elsewhere. Johnson K N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():A9. PubMed ID: 15250083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa. McGregor M; Moore R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain. McDonald TB Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions? Ezzard MM Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators. Eberl JT Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion. Rankin MJ Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. US pro-choice groups prepare for fight over Supreme Court nominee. Tanne JH BMJ; 2004 Nov; 329(7477):1254. PubMed ID: 15564237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment. Cherry AL Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade. Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The Court is ignoring science. Foster DG Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]