235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16282100)
1. Eggs, lies and compromise.
Philpott S
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 16282100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The once and future debate on human embryonic stem cell research.
Latham SR
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():483-94. PubMed ID: 19757716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Blastocyst transfer (sic) is no solution.
Robertson JA
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):18-20; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: the Blastocyst Transfer Method.
Liao SM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):8-16. PubMed ID: 16282102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What qualifies as a live embryo?
Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):23-5; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryological viability.
Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):17-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Zygote and "clonote"--the ethical use of embryonic stem cells.
McHugh PR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15254278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional constraints on the regulation of cloning.
Burt RA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():495-506. PubMed ID: 19757717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we really bypass the moral debate for embryo research?
Master Z
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):27-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars.
Yamamoto KR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The business of stem cells.
Spar D
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 15254279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Confronting deep moral disagreement: the President's Council on Bioethics, moral status, and human embryos.
Nelson LJ; Meyer MJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):33-42. PubMed ID: 16282112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical parthenote policy and the practice of science.
Campo-Engelstein L; Rodriguez S; Tingen C; Woodruff T
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):W1-2. PubMed ID: 21400373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the middle ground vanishing?
Trachtman HT
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):68-70; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The distinction between parthenotes and embryos is not easily made.
Schwartz PH
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 21400382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexless reproduction: a status symbol.
Havard M; Magnus D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):1. PubMed ID: 21400372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An obscure rider obstructing science: the conflation of parthenotes with embryos in the Dickey-Wicker amendment.
Rodriguez S; Campo-Engelstein L; Tingen C; Woodruff T
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 21400380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stem cell research: the bigger picture.
Dresser R
Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15834191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
