182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16282105)
1. The Blastocyst Transfer Method cannot rescue Human Embryonic Stem cell research.
Holm S
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):20-1; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Obtaining stem cells: moving from Scylla toward Charybdis.
Strong C
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):21-3; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can we really bypass the moral debate for embryo research?
Master Z
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):27-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem cells and the blastocyst transfer method: some concerns regarding autonomy.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):28-30; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What qualifies as a live embryo?
Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):23-5; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: the Blastocyst Transfer Method.
Liao SM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):8-16. PubMed ID: 16282102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blastocyst transfer (sic) is no solution.
Robertson JA
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):18-20; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Embryological viability.
Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):17-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Embryo autonomy?" What about the autonomy of infertility patients.
McLeod C
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):25-6; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ANT vs. SCNT.
Hyun I; Jung KW
Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):6; author reply 7. PubMed ID: 17278862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical justifications for moratoriums on vanguard scientific research.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):51-2; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surplus embryos, nonreproductive cloning, and the intend/foresee distinction.
FitzPatrick W
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 12854453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confronting deep moral disagreement: the President's Council on Bioethics, moral status, and human embryos.
Nelson LJ; Meyer MJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):33-42. PubMed ID: 16282112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward a full theory of moral status.
Green R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):44-6; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The disposer's dilemma.
Shabanowitz R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):60-1; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Eggs, lies and compromise.
Philpott S
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 16282100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cell science and politics: a talk with Elizabeth Blackburn.
Blackburn E
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 15887814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contexts, anyone? The need for contextualization in the debate about the moral status of embryos.
Klitzman R; Siragusa J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):56-8; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The subsidiarity principle in the context of embryonic stem cell research.
Pennings G; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15070889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem-cell research--signposts and roadblocks.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jul; 353(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16000350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
