188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16282107)
1. What qualifies as a live embryo?
Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):23-5; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can we really bypass the moral debate for embryo research?
Master Z
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):27-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Blastocyst Transfer Method cannot rescue Human Embryonic Stem cell research.
Holm S
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):20-1; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem cells and the blastocyst transfer method: some concerns regarding autonomy.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):28-30; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Obtaining stem cells: moving from Scylla toward Charybdis.
Strong C
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):21-3; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: the Blastocyst Transfer Method.
Liao SM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):8-16. PubMed ID: 16282102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryological viability.
Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):17-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ANT vs. SCNT.
Hyun I; Jung KW
Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):6; author reply 7. PubMed ID: 17278862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Blastocyst transfer (sic) is no solution.
Robertson JA
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):18-20; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Embryo autonomy?" What about the autonomy of infertility patients.
McLeod C
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):25-6; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a full theory of moral status.
Green R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):44-6; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Eggs, lies and compromise.
Philpott S
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 16282100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confronting deep moral disagreement: the President's Council on Bioethics, moral status, and human embryos.
Nelson LJ; Meyer MJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):33-42. PubMed ID: 16282112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical justifications for moratoriums on vanguard scientific research.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):51-2; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The disposer's dilemma.
Shabanowitz R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):60-1; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surplus embryos, nonreproductive cloning, and the intend/foresee distinction.
FitzPatrick W
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 12854453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The politics of human-embryo research--avoiding ethical gridlock.
Annas GJ; Caplan A; Elias S
N Engl J Med; 1996 May; 334(20):1329-32. PubMed ID: 8609955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Moral status revisited: the challenge of reversed potency.
Baertschi B; Mauron A
Bioethics; 2010 Feb; 24(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 19076125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double-effect reasoning and the conception of human embryos.
Murphy TF
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):529-32. PubMed ID: 22902385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An unanswered question.
Huarte J; Suarez A; Hurlbut WB
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(1):9, 19-22. PubMed ID: 15887331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
