253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16282117)
1. The public's role in science policy.
Zinser J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):58-60; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Slouching toward policy: lazy bioethics and the perils of science fiction.
Guyer RL; Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):W14-7. PubMed ID: 16192175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep disagreement and Rawlsian "public reasons".
White A; MacDonald C
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):62-3; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science policy. Biosummit seeks to draw Obama's attention to the life sciences.
Marshall E
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5908):1623. PubMed ID: 19074321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The President's Council on Bioethics 2002-2004: an overview.
Mahowald MB
Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 15834189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power and representation of the public's values in a social implications of research commission.
Evans JH
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 21534139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cell research and the role of the new President's Council on Bioethics.
Cohen CB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 12085946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal policy toward human embryonic stem cell research.
Childress JF
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 12085940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What's the professor got to do with it?
Maschke KJ
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):63-4. PubMed ID: 12762934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical research. A low-stress scheme for overhauling NIH's structure.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5633):574-5. PubMed ID: 12893911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science on trial: conflicts of interest jeopardize scientific integrity and public health.
Krimsky S
Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):3-6. PubMed ID: 15025119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing ethical issues in biomedicine: national policy perspectives.
Hatfield MO
Acad Med; 1994 Jul; 69(7):558-9. PubMed ID: 11644542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH cash tied to compulsory training in good behaviour.
Dalton R
Nature; 2000 Dec; 408(6813):629. PubMed ID: 11130036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
Mastroianni AC
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Academic-industrial relationships in the life sciences.
Blumenthal D
N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(25):2452-9. PubMed ID: 14681513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoughts of a former Council member.
Blackburn E
Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 15834190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism.
Green SK
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5737):1012-7; author reply 1012-7. PubMed ID: 16106520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. But was it bioethics?
Swazey JP
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6 Suppl):S5-6. PubMed ID: 11652245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
