These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16283537)

  • 1. Mixed effects versus fixed effects modelling of binary data with inter-subject variability.
    Murphy V; Dunne A
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2005 Apr; 32(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 16283537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
    Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.
    Savic RM; Mentré F; Lavielle M
    AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 21063925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laplace approximation in measurement error models.
    Battauz M
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 22223251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed-effects beta regression for modeling continuous bounded outcome scores using NONMEM when data are not on the boundaries.
    Xu XS; Samtani MN; Dunne A; Nandy P; Vermeulen A; De Ridder F;
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2013 Aug; 40(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 23645382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED.
    Jönsson S; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2004 Aug; 31(4):299-320. PubMed ID: 15563005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm.
    Dubois A; Lavielle M; Gsteiger S; Pigeolet E; Mentré F
    Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2582-600. PubMed ID: 21793036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance in population models for count data, part I: maximum likelihood approximations.
    Plan EL; Maloney A; Trocóniz IF; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):353-66. PubMed ID: 19653080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A family of linear mixed-effects models using the generalized Laplace distribution.
    Geraci M; Farcomeni A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2665-2682. PubMed ID: 32156192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating heterogeneity in random effects models for longitudinal data.
    Lemenuel-Diot A; Mallet A; Laveille C; Bruno R
    Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16053257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Zhao Y; Khan B; Negeri ZF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 38730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution.
    Geraci M; Bottai M
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jan; 8(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 16636139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantile regression in linear mixed models: a stochastic approximation EM approach.
    Galarza CE; Lachos VH; Bandyopadhyay D
    Stat Interface; 2017; 10(3):471-482. PubMed ID: 29104713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parameter estimation of multiple item response profile model.
    Cho SJ; Partchev I; De Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):438-66. PubMed ID: 22070786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model.
    Rijmen F; Tuerlinckx F; Meulders M; Smits DJ; Balázs K
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):273-88. PubMed ID: 15942071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of nonlinear mixed effects models in the presence of informative dropout.
    Björnsson MA; Friberg LE; Simonsson US
    AAPS J; 2015 Jan; 17(1):245-55. PubMed ID: 25421458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.