662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16283852)
1. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
Bariol SV; Stewart GD; Tolley DA
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.
Weld KJ; Arzola J; Montiglio C; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18242360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.
Abiri A; Paydar O; Tao A; LaRocca M; Liu K; Genovese B; Candler R; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3258-3270. PubMed ID: 27928670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
Odijk R; Hennipman B; Rousian M; Madani K; Dijksterhuis M; de Leeuw JW; van Hof A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How reliable is intracorporeal laparoscopic knot tying?
Lopez PJ; Veness J; Wojcik A; Curry J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Aug; 16(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 16968200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Securing extraocular muscles in strabismus surgery: laboratory analysis of biomechanical parameters related to the suture.
Brooks SE
J AAPOS; 2017 Dec; 21(6):457-459.e1. PubMed ID: 28989101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.
Gartti-Jardim EC; de Souza AP; Carvalho AC; Pereira CC; Okamoto R; Magro Filho O
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23269361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.
Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical and functional comparison of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with Coated VICRYL* Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).
Storch M; Scalzo H; Van Lue S; Jacinto G
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S65-77. PubMed ID: 12573041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Evaluation of the Tensile Strength of Polyglactin Sutures After Immersion in Different Herbal Mouthwashes: An In Vitro Study.
Ojastha BL; Jeevitha M
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43407. PubMed ID: 37706141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Holding Strength of Suture: An Experimental Study Using Porcine Kidney.
Özkuvanci Ü; Akpinar H; Karadag MA; Dönmez Mİ; Altunrende F
JSLS; 2017; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 28729782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the urethrovesical anastomoses with polyglecaprone (Monocryl®) and bidirectional barbed (V-Loc 180®) running sutures in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Arslan M; Tuncel A; Aslan Y; Kozacioglu Z; Gunlusoy B; Atan A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2014 Jun; 86(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 25017586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Fluoridated Mouthwashes on Strength and Durability of Three Different Synthetic Absorbable Suturing Materials: An
Awasthi N; Ramanna PK; Lahiri B; Das A; Ravi RV; Mishra D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Apr; 23(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 35945837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative physical and handling characteristics of novel antibacterial braided silk suture materials.
Chen X; Hou D; Tang X; Wang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():160-70. PubMed ID: 26143308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study.
Ruiz de Adana JC; Hernández Matías A; Hernández Bartolomé M; Manzanedo Romero I; Leon Ledesma R; Valle Rubio A; López Herrero J; Limones Esteban M
Obes Surg; 2009 Sep; 19(9):1274-7. PubMed ID: 19557484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
