These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Markar SR; Kutty R; Edmonds L; Sadat U; Nair S Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 19942633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest with the SaphLITE system. O-Yurvati AH; Martin AK; Peska D Int Surg; 2005; 90(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15912895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis. Simek M; Nemec P; Bruk V; Gwozdziewicz M; Fluger I; Langova K Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Oct; 55(7):428-32. PubMed ID: 17902064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of less invasive method for saphenous vein harvest in patients with type II diabetes. Nasso G; Anselmi A; De Filippo CM; Modugno P; Canosa C; Spatuzza P; Testa N; Guerrieri MW; Calvo E; Alessandrini F J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Jul; 8(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 17568284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Allen KB; Heimansohn DA; Robison RJ; Schier JJ; Griffith GL; Fitzgerald EB; Isch JH; Abraham S; Shaar CJ Heart Surg Forum; 2000; 3(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 11178296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique. Khan UA; Krishnamoorthy B; Najam O; Waterworth P; Fildes JE; Yonan N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19696051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting. Reed JF Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2008 Dec; 7(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 18815201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Wang S; Tang H; Wilkinson V; Lukat T; Gelfand ET; Koshal A; Modry DL; Mullen JC; Hao C; Finegan BA Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique? Rao C; Aziz O; Deeba S; Chow A; Jones C; Ni Z; Papastavrou L; Rahman S; Darzi A; Athanasiou T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 18374760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach? Isgro F; Weisse U; Voss B; Kiessling AH; Saggau W Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S58-60. PubMed ID: 10613558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting--comparison of three less invasive methods. Cisowski M; Wites M; Gerber W; Drzewiecka-Gerber A; Bochenek A Med Sci Monit; 2000; 6(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 11208401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]