These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16285101)

  • 1. United States v. Jacobson.
    United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia
    Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16285101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. United States v. Jacobson.
    United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16372436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Johnson v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District
    Wests Calif Report; 2000; 95():864-79. PubMed ID: 17225339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Woodward v. Commissioner of Social Security.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
    Wests North East Rep; 2002; 760():257-72. PubMed ID: 16444837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Regarding the child's right to information about his/her natural parents and regarding the parents' right to information about the actual maternity or paternity].
    Rotax HH
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2007; 56(2):148-71. PubMed ID: 17410931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Federal Act Amending Law Relating to Children (Children's Law Amendment Act), 15 March 1989.
    Austria
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():105. PubMed ID: 12344034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kevorkian v. Arnett.
    United States. District Court. Central District Court of California
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court
    Wests North East Rep; 2001; 756():1133-41. PubMed ID: 17225347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hecht v. Superior Court (Kane).
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 7
    Wests Calif Report; 1993 Jun; 20():275-91. PubMed ID: 11648608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.
    Isaksson S; Skoog-Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Linell L; Lampic C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26637490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Donaldson v. Van de Kamp: cryonics, assisted suicide, and the challenges of medical science.
    Pommer RW
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():589-603. PubMed ID: 10183890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prescription data mining, medical privacy and the First Amendment: the U.S. Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS health Inc.
    Boumil MM; Dunn K; Ryan N; Clearwater K
    Ann Health Law; 2012; 21(2):447-91, 4 p preceding i. PubMed ID: 22606922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kevorkian v. Arnett.
    United States. District Court. Central District Court of California
    Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16285108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes and disclosure decisions of Finnish parents with children conceived using donor sperm.
    Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2746-54. PubMed ID: 23906900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appeals Courts decision reverses former minors' contraceptive position.
    Kerr AS
    Mich Med; 1980 Jun; 79(17):331. PubMed ID: 7207242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The experience of the child witness: Legal and psychological issues.
    Robinson J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():168-76. PubMed ID: 26343312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hodgson v. Minnesota.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2926-72. PubMed ID: 12041294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Privacy on thin ice? Considering the California Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. Superior Court.
    Plosker JA
    Jurimetrics; 2001; 42(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12769113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.