These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16285240)

  • 1. [Specific features of high-voltage microfocal medical X-ray diagnosis].
    Potrakhov NN; Griaznov AIu
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):14-9. PubMed ID: 16285240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of voltage errors of an x-ray diagnostic apparatus on the quality of the x-ray image].
    Blinov NN; Popova TA; Shvartsman AZ
    Med Tekh; 1977; (3):22-7. PubMed ID: 886947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular resolution in magnification radiography and the observation of x-ray wave interaction signatures.
    Midgley S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5173-86. PubMed ID: 17762079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the dynamic range of digital X-ray receivers].
    Veĭp IuA
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):8-10. PubMed ID: 16285238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
    Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Specific features of the use of microfocal radiography in medical diagnosis].
    Potrakhov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):6-8. PubMed ID: 16285237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. K-edge imaging in x-ray computed tomography using multi-bin photon counting detectors.
    Roessl E; Proksa R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4679-96. PubMed ID: 17634657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Conversion coefficients for estimation of effective dose to patients from dose area product during fluoroscopy x-ray examinations].
    Gosch D; Gosch K; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1035-42. PubMed ID: 17879174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and implementation of a compact low-dose diffraction enhanced medical imaging system.
    Parham C; Zhong Z; Connor DM; Chapman LD; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):911-7. PubMed ID: 19375952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The determination of tube kV and inherent filtration in x-ray departments (author's transl)].
    Schaal A
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Aug; 121(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 4370572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of the x-ray tube anode current on the intensity and energy spectrum of the radiation].
    Blinov NN; Vasil'ev VN; Gromov GD; Zhutiaev SG; Lebedev LA
    Med Tekh; 1984; (3):22-5. PubMed ID: 6748895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.