These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16285543)

  • 21. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Experimental study of preparation errors during instrumentation of artificial curved root canals with stainless steel K files].
    Zhou PG; Gu YC; Ding YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Jun; 16(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 17660926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Evaluation of the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary Protaper during root canal preparation].
    Gao MJ; Zhou J; Jiang XZ; Liang L
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Jun; 21(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 22885490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparison of the effect of three nickel-titanium instruments on molar root canal curvature].
    Meng DJ; Yao LL; Li M
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Aug; 27(4):407-410. PubMed ID: 30483710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
    Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Florek H
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 12190907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
    Gergi R; Rjeily JA; Sader J; Naaman A
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):904-7. PubMed ID: 20416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals.
    Garip Y; Günday M
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):452-7. PubMed ID: 11556512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments.
    Esposito PT; Cunningham CJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 7673815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
    Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.