263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16286208)
1. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Vaughn GA; Mason B; Moon HB; Turley PK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 16168327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
Kim KR; Muhl ZF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative long term post-treatment changes in hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 patients with early cervical traction treatment.
Junkin JB; Andria LM
Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11843274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring.
Stromeyer EL; Caruso JM; DeVincenzo JP
Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12071603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
Hubbard GW; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
