105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16286215)
1. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 16286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plane orientation for standardization in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with computerized tomography imaging.
Lagravère MO; Hansen L; Harzer W; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16679199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e203-10. PubMed ID: 21392663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of the 3D-cephalogram: a technical note.
Kamiishi H; Miyasato Y; Kosaka M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):258-60. PubMed ID: 17601743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Alves PV; Bolognese AM; Zhao L
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):427-36. PubMed ID: 17692702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.
Tang X; Hsieh J; Nilsen RA; Dutta S; Samsonov D; Hagiwara A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):855-74. PubMed ID: 16467583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
Kusnoto B
Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Sukovic P
J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 72(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16480609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric landmark identification consistency between undergraduate dental students and orthodontic residents in 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study.
Míguez-Contreras M; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Romero-Maroto M; López-de-Andrés A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28024771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.
Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 15877045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures.
Stratemann SA; Huang JC; Maki K; Miller AJ; Hatcher DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Feb; 37(2):80-93. PubMed ID: 18239035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
