105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16286215)
21. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from a natural ear to aid rehabilitation.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16479767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High performance cone-beam spiral backprojection with voxel-specific weighting.
Steckmann S; Knaup M; Kachelriess M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3691-708. PubMed ID: 19478378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The reproducibility of Johnston's cephalometric superimposition method.
Hashim HA; Godfrey K
Aust Orthod J; 1990 Oct; 11(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 2152537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of craniofacial measurements: computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography compared with stereolithographic models.
Frühwald J; Schicho KA; Figl M; Benesch T; Watzinger F; Kainberger F
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18216660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Major PW; Carey J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):400-8. PubMed ID: 20841457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional analysis in facial asymmetry: comparison with model analysis and conventional two-dimensional analysis.
Moro A; Correra P; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Pelo S
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19258903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Completing the 3-dimensional picture.
Lane C; Harrell W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 18405826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.
Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schwarz U; Teschner M; Hammer B; Schmelzeisen R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 18230371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A differentiable Shepp-Logan phantom and its applications in exact cone-beam CT.
Yu H; Zhao S; Wang G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5583-95. PubMed ID: 16306654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application.
Kau CH; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Bibb R; Sugar A; Knox J; Hartles F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 16781342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of middle ear biomechanics by high-resolution computed tomography and finite element analysis.
Lee CF; Chen PR; Lee WJ; Chen JH; Liu TC
Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 16652076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Cephalometric standards. I: Parameters in the vertical plane].
Oddini S; Dessi S; Pulixi S
Mondo Ortod; 1985; 10(5):37-47. PubMed ID: 3869677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Position of the sella turcica in cephalometric diagnosis].
Tammoscheit UG; Blezner L
Quintessenz; 1982 May; 33(5):1001-10. PubMed ID: 6955851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Cephalometric standards. 2: Parameters in the antero-posterior plane].
Dessi S; Oddini S; Pulixi S
Mondo Ortod; 1985; 10(5):63-74. PubMed ID: 3869679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Cephalometric study of the pterygoid process linear parameters in the human adult and child].
Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Meyer P; Sick H
Arch Anat Histol Embryol; 1993-1994; 75():7-29. PubMed ID: 8881553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Place and form of medial cranial fossa foramina].
Lang J; Tisch-Rottensteiner K
Verh Anat Ges; 1976; (70 Pt 2):557-65. PubMed ID: 1024348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A synthetic three-dimensional craniofacial analysis.
Farronato G; Farronato D; Toma L; Bellincioni F
J Clin Orthod; 2010 Nov; 44(11):673-8; quiz 688. PubMed ID: 21488433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Brainatomy: A Novel Way of Teaching Sphenoid Bone Anatomy With a Simplified 3-Dimensional Model.
Er K; Schmieder K; Brenke C; Miller D; Parpaley Y; Gierthmuehlen M
World Neurosurg; 2020 Mar; 135():e50-e70. PubMed ID: 31678451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application clinic of anatomy and multi-slice helical CT three-dimensional reconstruction in the sphenopalatine foramen].
Gui P; Zhou SM; Liang WP; Fu M; Ji R; Li S; Ren F
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 40(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 16429739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
