330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16286349)
1. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions.
Reuter DA; Goepfert MS; Goresch T; Schmoeckel M; Kilger E; Goetz AE
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15591333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Respiratory systolic variation test in acutely impaired cardiac function for predicting volume responsiveness in pigs.
Eichhorn V; Trepte C; Richter HP; Kubitz JC; Goepfert MS; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2011 May; 106(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 21441547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.
Tavernier B; Makhotine O; Lebuffe G; Dupont J; Scherpereel P
Anesthesiology; 1998 Dec; 89(6):1313-21. PubMed ID: 9856704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke volume variation measured with uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients with impaired left ventricular function: a prospective, observational study.
Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; de Waal EE
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 26227160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.
Marik PE; Cavallazzi R; Vasu T; Hirani A
Crit Care Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):2642-7. PubMed ID: 19602972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy.
Davies SJ; Minhas S; Wilson RJ; Yates D; Howell SJ
J Clin Anesth; 2013 Sep; 25(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 23965199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
Lee JH; Kim JT; Yoon SZ; Lim YJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Kim CS
Br J Anaesth; 2007 Sep; 99(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 17621598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Hagen OA; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Aug; 58(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24773498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively.
Lahner D; Kabon B; Marschalek C; Chiari A; Pestel G; Kaider A; Fleischmann E; Hetz H
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 103(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 19628484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography.
Hofer CK; Furrer L; Matter-Ensner S; Maloigne M; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Jun; 94(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 15790674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
