These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16286615)

  • 1. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.
    Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Bostrom A; Nee M; Stamper RL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1532-7. PubMed ID: 16286615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
    Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Lee J; Lee CH; Choi J; Yoon SY; Sung KR; Park SB; Kook MS
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19337476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations.
    Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Nee M; Bostrom A; Stürmer J; Stamper RL
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16633220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Realini T; Weinreb RN; Hobbs G
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19225347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.