149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1628688)
1. The treatment of severe 'gummy' Class II division 1 malocclusion using the maxillary intrusion splint.
Orton HS; Slattery DA; Orton S
Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 1628688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
Remmelink HJ; Tan BG
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class II malocclusion correction: an American board of orthodontics case.
Snyder RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 10511670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
Shah AH
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The potentiality of antero-posterior orthodontic extraoral traction: clinical and cephalometric results].
Deblock L; Becker A
Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():381-93. PubMed ID: 1341727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
Cura N; Saraç M
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
