47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16289208)
21. Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?
Todd JT; Christensen JC; Guckes KM
J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):20.1-18. PubMed ID: 20462321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stereopsis and aging.
Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE
Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K
Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Independent encoding of surface orientation and surface curvature.
Johnston A; Passmore PJ
Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(22):3005-12. PubMed ID: 7975335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Visual discrimination of local surface structure: slant, tilt, and curvedness.
Norman JF; Todd JT; Norman HF; Clayton AM; McBride TR
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1057-69. PubMed ID: 16289208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis.
Wilcox LM; Allison RS
Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2653-65. PubMed ID: 19520102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Representation of binocular surfaces by cortical neurons.
Bridge H; Cumming BG
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18809495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fechner, information, and shape perception.
Lappin JS; Norman JF; Phillips F
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2353-78. PubMed ID: 21879419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Configuration stereopsis: a new look at the depth-disparity relation.
Richards W
Spat Vis; 2009; 22(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 19055889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
Harris JM; Wilcox LM
Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.
Kunimoto C; Miller J; Pashler H
Conscious Cogn; 2001 Sep; 10(3):294-340. PubMed ID: 11697867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Binocular vision: moving closer to reality.
Harris JM
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2004 Dec; 362(1825):2721-39. PubMed ID: 15539367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties.
Nishida S; Shinya M
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1998 Dec; 15(12):2951-65. PubMed ID: 9857525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Binocular mechanisms mediating crossed and uncrossed stereopsis.
Mustillo P
Psychol Bull; 1985 Mar; 97(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 3885281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
