These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16289335)

  • 21. Aggressive traffic enforcement: a simple and effective injury prevention program.
    Davis JW; Bennink LD; Pepper DR; Parks SN; Lemaster DM; Townsend RN
    J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):972-6; discussion 976-7. PubMed ID: 16688057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of driver behavior at railroad grade crossings with two different protection systems.
    Meeker F; Fox D; Weber C
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Jan; 29(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9110035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A mathematical modeling approach to resource allocation for railroad-highway crossing safety upgrades.
    Konur D; Golias MM; Darks B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():192-201. PubMed ID: 23253628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development of an automatic method of safety monitoring at Pelican crossings.
    Malkhamah S; Tight M; Montgomery F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Sep; 37(5):938-46. PubMed ID: 15919048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings.
    Davey J; Wallace A; Stenson N; Freeman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1217-22. PubMed ID: 18460391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Notes. Not enough children ages four through eight using booster seats.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 45(2):157; discussion 157-9. PubMed ID: 15671972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The crash at Kerang: Investigating systemic and psychological factors leading to unintentional non-compliance at rail level crossings.
    Salmon PM; Read GJ; Stanton NA; Lenné MG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1278-88. PubMed ID: 23122328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suggestions for more effective rail crossing lights.
    Schryver BJ
    Occup Health Saf; 2002 Aug; 71(8):10. PubMed ID: 12197435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of traffic light vs. boom barrier controls at road-rail level crossings: a simulator study.
    Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Edquist J; Navarro J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():187-94. PubMed ID: 22269500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Wallis G; Cloete S; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():104-11. PubMed ID: 23207839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cause, effect and regression in road safety: a case study.
    Hauer E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20441822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying effects of ramp metering on freeway safety.
    Lee C; Hellinga B; Ozbay K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 16329982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of infrastructure and demographic change on traffic-related fatalities and crashes: a case study of Illinois county-level data.
    Noland RB; Oh L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Jul; 36(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 15094404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian methodology incorporating expert judgment for ranking countermeasure effectiveness under uncertainty: example applied to at grade railroad crossings in Korea.
    Washington S; Oh J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):234-47. PubMed ID: 16288710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring pre-crash gate violations behaviors of drivers at highway-rail grade crossings using a mixed multinomial logit model.
    Kutela B; Kidando E; Kitali AE; Mwende S; Langa N; Novat N
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2022 Jun; 29(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 35132936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ergonomics solution for crossing collisions based on field assessment of visual environment at urban intersections in Japan.
    Mori M; Horino S; Kitajima S; Ueyama M; Ebara T; Itani T
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 18355798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating the effectiveness of safety countermeasures at highway-rail at-grade crossings using a competing risk model.
    Keramati A; Lu P; Ren Y; Tolliver D; Ai C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():251-261. PubMed ID: 34399921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Training the new generation of drivers. Interview by Jerry Laws.
    Smith J
    Occup Health Saf; 2010 Mar; 79(3):32, 34. PubMed ID: 20329467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safe pedestrian crossings for children and elderly.
    Leden L; Gårder P; Johansson C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 16263073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evaluation of road-rail crossing safety with limited accident statistics.
    Gitelman V; Hakkert AS
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Mar; 29(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 9088356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.