These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16289517)

  • 1. Effects of delays on human performance on a temporal discrimination procedure: evidence of a choose-short effect.
    Lieving LM; Lane SD; Cherek DR; Tcheremissine OV
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):135-43. PubMed ID: 16289517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17110057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dopamine agonists and antagonists can produce an attenuation of response bias in a temporal discrimination task depending on discriminability of target duration.
    Harper DN; Bizo LA; Peters H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):286-96. PubMed ID: 16413975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choose-long errors at delays shorter than the training delay persist when enhanced between-trial summation of duration memories are precluded in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 19683036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rats' memory for event duration in delayed matching-to-sample with nonspatial comparison response alternatives.
    Van Rooyen P; McMillan N; Santi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18222613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16481126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory for temporal and nontemporal events in monkeys.
    Sakurai Y
    Learn Mem; 2001; 8(6):309-16. PubMed ID: 11773430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of marijuana on temporal discriminations in humans.
    Lieving LM; Lane SD; Cherek DR; Tcheremissine OV
    Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 17(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 16495725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal dynamics of stimulus-specific gamma-band activity components during auditory short-term memory.
    Kaiser J; Rahm B; Lutzenberger W
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):257-64. PubMed ID: 18790066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory memory: a comparison between humans and starlings.
    Zokoll MA; Naue N; Herrmann CS; Langemann U
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():33-46. PubMed ID: 18291352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prefrontal gamma-band activity distinguishes between sound durations.
    Kaiser J; Leiberg S; Rust H; Lutzenberger W
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1139():153-62. PubMed ID: 17270158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of changes in consequences on hens' performance in delayed-matching-to-sample tasks.
    Nakagawa S; Etheredge RJ; Foster TM; Sumpter CE; Temple W
    Behav Processes; 2004 Nov; 67(3):441-51. PubMed ID: 15518993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
    Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective shortening in humans' memory for stimulus duration.
    Wearden JH; Ferrara A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 May; 46(2):163-86. PubMed ID: 8316643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice and timing in concurrent chains: effects of initial-link duration.
    Grace RC; Berg ME; Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):188-200. PubMed ID: 16388918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do humans learn in a double, temporal bisection task: absolute or relative stimulus durations?
    Spínola I; Machado A; de Carvalho MP; Tonneau F
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():40-9. PubMed ID: 23353726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):392-408. PubMed ID: 17924788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.